You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
So we are trying to end up with being able to turn on hybrid X25519/MLKEM768 key exchange on the WebSocket server. This is supported in BoringSSL, although digging through the source it looks like it is building in oven-sh/boringssl, which is about 7 months behind the google repo (although has a number of patches from electron).
When we run node:crypto.getCurves, we see: [ "secp224r1", "prime256v1", "secp384r1", "secp521r1" ]
And in the included uSockets module, it appears only to be using OpenSSL, which we know provides the underlying socket for the uWebSockets module used in bun.serve. Expect we're missing something here so any guidance or help very much appreciated.
Happy to help test and validate things, as this capability is key for supporting post quantum cryptography. Not sure if there's also a way of using a more recent BoringSSL build either.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
So we are trying to end up with being able to turn on hybrid X25519/MLKEM768 key exchange on the WebSocket server. This is supported in BoringSSL, although digging through the source it looks like it is building in oven-sh/boringssl, which is about 7 months behind the google repo (although has a number of patches from electron).
When we run node:crypto.getCurves, we see:
[ "secp224r1", "prime256v1", "secp384r1", "secp521r1" ]
And in the included uSockets module, it appears only to be using OpenSSL, which we know provides the underlying socket for the uWebSockets module used in bun.serve. Expect we're missing something here so any guidance or help very much appreciated.
Happy to help test and validate things, as this capability is key for supporting post quantum cryptography. Not sure if there's also a way of using a more recent BoringSSL build either.
Thanks
Rob
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions