Skip to content

Conversation

xianglongfei-8888
Copy link

@xianglongfei-8888 xianglongfei-8888 commented Jun 25, 2025

Fixed the issue in sysinfo where the dmidecode and fdisk - l commands were executed. In the uos/deepin/openEuler desktop environment, data could not be obtained and had to be executed with sudo privilege.

Before repair:

image

After repair:

image

image

Both the 'post' and 'pre' directories have been verified, and regular users have the ability to perform authorization operations and need to enter a password.

image

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • System information collection commands and daemons now consistently run with elevated (sudo) privileges, improving access to system-level data where required.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Ensures all relevant system information gathering processes use sudo, reducing potential permission-related issues during data collection.

… were executed.

Description:
Fixed the issue in sysinfo where the dmidecode and fdisk - l commands
were executed. In the uos/deepin/openEuler desktop environment, data
could not be obtained and had to be executed with sudo privilege.
@mr-avocado
Copy link

mr-avocado bot commented Jun 25, 2025

Dear contributor,
the rpm-build:fedora-rawhide-x86_64 CI failure is probably not caused by your changes, but an infrastructure issue. Please ignore this failure.

@mr-avocado mr-avocado bot moved this to Review Requested in Default project Jun 25, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 25, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a use_sudo parameter to the Command class in the system info utilities, allowing commands to be executed with elevated privileges when required. The core system info collection logic now instantiates all relevant Daemon and Command objects with use_sudo=True, ensuring these commands run with sudo by default.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
avocado/core/sysinfo.py Updated _set_collectibles to instantiate Daemon and Command objects with use_sudo=True.
avocado/utils/sysinfo.py Added use_sudo parameter to Command class; prefixed executed commands with sudo if set to True.

Poem

In burrows deep where sudo reigns,
Commands now hop with admin gains.
Daemons march with privilege new,
Gathering facts the rabbit’s due.
With every shell and every line,
Sysinfo’s secrets now align!
🐰✨

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 Pylint (3.3.7)
avocado/utils/sysinfo.py
avocado/core/sysinfo.py
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
avocado/utils/sysinfo.py (1)

179-180: Remove commented code.

Clean up the commented line to improve code readability.

Apply this diff:

-                # self.cmd,
                 cmd_run,
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cddeb37 and e724e1f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • avocado/core/sysinfo.py (1 hunks)
  • avocado/utils/sysinfo.py (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Flake8 (7.2.0)
avocado/utils/sysinfo.py

[error] 173-173: multiple spaces after operator

(E222)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (24)
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-s390x
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-42-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:centos-stream-9-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-ppc64le
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-rawhide-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-aarch64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:epel-9-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-s390x
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:centos-stream-9-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-rawhide-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:epel-9-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-aarch64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-42-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-ppc64le
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-s390x
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:epel-9-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-aarch64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-rawhide-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-42-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:centos-stream-9-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-ppc64le
🔇 Additional comments (3)
avocado/utils/sysinfo.py (2)

135-141: LGTM: Parameter addition is well-implemented.

The use_sudo parameter is properly added with a sensible default value and correctly stored as an instance attribute.


209-210: ```shell
#!/bin/bash

Display the Daemon class definition including its init method

rg -A20 -n "class Daemon" avocado/utils/sysinfo.py


</details>
<details>
<summary>avocado/core/sysinfo.py (1)</summary>

`135-135`: **Verify profiler daemon compatibility with sudo.**

Ensure that profiler daemons work correctly when run with sudo privileges, as this may affect their ability to monitor user processes or access certain system resources.


```web
What are the implications of running system profiler daemons (like perf, sar, iostat) with sudo privileges? Do they still properly monitor user processes and system resources?

Comment on lines +172 to +176

cmd_run = self.cmd
if self.use_sudo:
cmd_run = f"sudo {self.cmd}"

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix formatting issue and consider edge cases.

The implementation has a formatting issue and should handle edge cases better.

Apply this diff to fix the formatting and improve robustness:

-
-        cmd_run =  self.cmd
-        if self.use_sudo:
-            cmd_run = f"sudo {self.cmd}"
-
+        cmd_run = self.cmd
+        if self.use_sudo and not self.cmd.strip().startswith('sudo '):
+            cmd_run = f"sudo {self.cmd}"

This change:

  1. Fixes the formatting issue (multiple spaces after operator)
  2. Prevents duplicate sudo prefixes if the command already contains sudo
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
cmd_run = self.cmd
if self.use_sudo:
cmd_run = f"sudo {self.cmd}"
cmd_run = self.cmd
if self.use_sudo and not self.cmd.strip().startswith('sudo '):
cmd_run = f"sudo {self.cmd}"
🧰 Tools
🪛 Flake8 (7.2.0)

[error] 173-173: multiple spaces after operator

(E222)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In avocado/utils/sysinfo.py around lines 172 to 176, fix the formatting issue by
removing extra spaces around the assignment operator and improve robustness by
checking if the command already starts with "sudo" before prefixing it with
"sudo". Update the code to conditionally add "sudo" only if it is not already
present at the start of the command string.

Comment on lines +135 to +147
self.start_collectibles.add(sysinfo.Daemon(cmd, locale=locale, use_sudo=True))

for cmd in self.sysinfo_files["commands"]:
self.start_collectibles.add(
sysinfo.Command(cmd, timeout=timeout, locale=locale)
sysinfo.Command(cmd, timeout=timeout, locale=locale, use_sudo=True)
)
self.end_collectibles.add(
sysinfo.Command(cmd, timeout=timeout, locale=locale)
sysinfo.Command(cmd, timeout=timeout, locale=locale, use_sudo=True)
)

for fail_cmd in self.sysinfo_files["fail_commands"]:
self.end_fail_collectibles.add(
sysinfo.Command(fail_cmd, timeout=timeout, locale=locale)
sysinfo.Command(fail_cmd, timeout=timeout, locale=locale, use_sudo=True)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider security implications of blanket sudo usage.

While the changes address the PR objective, running ALL system information commands with sudo privileges raises security concerns and may cause authentication prompts in automated environments.

Consider these improvements:

  1. Selective sudo usage: Only apply sudo to commands that actually require it (dmidecode, fdisk, etc.)
  2. Configuration option: Make sudo usage configurable rather than hardcoded
  3. Passwordless sudo: Document the need for passwordless sudo configuration for automation

Example selective approach:

 # Commands that typically require elevated privileges
+SUDO_REQUIRED_COMMANDS = ['dmidecode', 'fdisk', 'lshw', 'smartctl']
+
+def _needs_sudo(cmd):
+    return any(cmd.strip().startswith(sudo_cmd) for sudo_cmd in SUDO_REQUIRED_COMMANDS)
+
 for cmd in self.sysinfo_files["commands"]:
+    use_sudo = _needs_sudo(cmd)
     self.start_collectibles.add(
-        sysinfo.Command(cmd, timeout=timeout, locale=locale, use_sudo=True)
+        sysinfo.Command(cmd, timeout=timeout, locale=locale, use_sudo=use_sudo)
     )

This approach minimizes security risk while still addressing the specific commands mentioned in the PR.

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In avocado/core/sysinfo.py around lines 135 to 147, the current code applies
sudo to all system information commands indiscriminately, which poses security
risks and may trigger authentication prompts. Modify the code to apply sudo only
to specific commands that require elevated privileges, such as dmidecode or
fdisk. Implement a configuration option to control sudo usage instead of
hardcoding it, allowing flexibility for different environments. Additionally,
document the requirement for passwordless sudo setup to ensure smooth automation
without manual password entry.

@xianglongfei-8888
Copy link
Author

Hi @richtja, Please help review the code and see if it needs to be optimized according to AI suggestions. It seems that the code has become more complex.

@richtja
Copy link
Contributor

richtja commented Jun 25, 2025

Hi @xianglongfei-8888, sure thing, I can look into it. Unfortunately, I am unavailable right now, I will be able to do the review in two weeks.

@xianglongfei-8888
Copy link
Author

Hi @richtja, Thanks for your reply!

Copy link
Contributor

@richtja richtja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @xianglongfei-8888, IMO using sudo as option for all sysinfo commands is not good idea, because those commands are configurable, and you can basically run anything through sysinfo commands which has potential security risks.

Probably specifying the commands which can be run with sudo and can't be rewritten would be a possible solution. @clebergnu, what do you think?

@clebergnu
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @xianglongfei-8888, IMO using sudo as option for all sysinfo commands is not good idea, because those commands are configurable, and you can basically run anything through sysinfo commands which has potential security risks.

Probably specifying the commands which can be run with sudo and can't be rewritten would be a possible solution. @clebergnu, what do you think?

Hi @xianglongfei-8888, have you considered writing a wrapper script that uses sudo to collect the data you want? Since you'll have to configure your system anyway, you can add the sudo configuration, this wrapper script and the Avocado sysinfo configuration "at once".

Let me know what you think.

@xianglongfei-8888
Copy link
Author

Hi @xianglongfei-8888, IMO using sudo as option for all sysinfo commands is not good idea, because those commands are configurable, and you can basically run anything through sysinfo commands which has potential security risks.
Probably specifying the commands which can be run with sudo and can't be rewritten would be a possible solution. @clebergnu, what do you think?

Hi @xianglongfei-8888, have you considered writing a wrapper script that uses sudo to collect the data you want? Since you'll have to configure your system anyway, you can add the sudo configuration, this wrapper script and the Avocado sysinfo configuration "at once".

Let me know what you think.

@richtja You're absolutely right!
@clebergnu Thank you, I will rethink and try how to achieve it!

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Review Requested to Done 112 in Default project Sep 2, 2025
@xianglongfei-8888
Copy link
Author

@richtja @clebergnu
submitted:#6213

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done 112
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants