Skip to content

chore: fix semantic error #1339

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

chore: fix semantic error #1339

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

katsyuta
Copy link

@katsyuta katsyuta commented Mar 6, 2025

closes #1338

elektronik2k5
elektronik2k5 requested changes Mar 7, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@elektronik2k5 elektronik2k5 left a comment •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please undo the unrelated change and keep only the intended one.

@katsyuta katsyuta requested a review from elektronik2k5 March 7, 2025 15:57
@elektronik2k5
Copy link
Collaborator

@goldbergyoni I don't think the CI job failure has anything to do with the contents of this PR. How do we handle this?

@JaclynCodes
Copy link

This pull request makes a minor update to the README.md file, improving the clarity and readability of the summary about system structure and modular components. The change mainly rephrases a sentence to better convey the benefits of having autonomous components.

  • Improved the explanation in the 📝 #updated section to clarify how autonomous components reduce mental overload, development friction, and deployment fear, resulting in a smoother development process.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@elektronik2k5 elektronik2k5 elektronik2k5 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Semantic error in sentence
3 participants
@katsyuta @elektronik2k5 @JaclynCodes