Skip to content

Conversation

haircommander
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?


Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. label Aug 4, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 4, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@haircommander: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from rphillips and sjenning August 4, 2025 20:08
@haircommander
Copy link
Member Author

/payload-aggregate periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.20-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt 4

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 4, 2025

@haircommander: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.20-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/34e20ca0-7174-11f0-844a-dd96e8b37473-0

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@haircommander: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@haircommander: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@haircommander
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@haircommander: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@haircommander: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@haircommander: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits are valid:

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@haircommander
Copy link
Member Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-eng-ocp-qe-perfscale-ci-main-aws-4.20-nightly-x86-payload-control-plane-6nodes

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 14, 2025

@haircommander: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-eng-ocp-qe-perfscale-ci-main-aws-4.20-nightly-x86-payload-control-plane-6nodes

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/3bdc52f0-7943-11f0-81b3-d4ce7b481974-0

@haircommander
Copy link
Member Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-eng-ocp-qe-perfscale-ci-main-aws-4.20-nightly-x86-payload-control-plane-6nodes

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 14, 2025

@haircommander: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-eng-ocp-qe-perfscale-ci-main-aws-4.20-nightly-x86-payload-control-plane-6nodes

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/a041d630-794c-11f0-930e-b89352640fc5-0

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@haircommander: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits are valid:

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@haircommander
Copy link
Member Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-eng-ocp-qe-perfscale-ci-main-aws-4.20-nightly-x86-payload-control-plane-6nodes

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 14, 2025

@haircommander: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-eng-ocp-qe-perfscale-ci-main-aws-4.20-nightly-x86-payload-control-plane-6nodes

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/6f397860-794f-11f0-8044-9efb1b9469a0-0

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@haircommander: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits are valid:

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@haircommander: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits are valid:

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files label Aug 21, 2025
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 21, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: haircommander
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign deads2k for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <pehunt@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@haircommander: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@haircommander
Copy link
Member Author

/test e2e-aws-ovn-runc
/test e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2

@haircommander
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@haircommander
Copy link
Member Author

/test e2e-aws-ovn-crun

@haircommander
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 27, 2025

@haircommander: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-disruptive 85ed8ee link false /test e2e-aws-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack 85ed8ee link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-csi-manila 85ed8ee link false /test e2e-openstack-csi-manila
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-csi-cinder 85ed8ee link false /test e2e-openstack-csi-cinder
ci/prow/e2e-aws 85ed8ee link false /test e2e-aws
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-gcp-five-control-plane-replicas 85ed8ee link false /test k8s-e2e-gcp-five-control-plane-replicas
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 b7534f3 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-gcp-ovn 5681732 link true /test k8s-e2e-gcp-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial 5681732 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview 5681732 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview
ci/prow/e2e-aws-crun-wasm 5681732 link true /test e2e-aws-crun-wasm
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-crun 5681732 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-crun
ci/prow/verify 5681732 link true /test verify
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2 5681732 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-fips 5681732 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
ci/prow/e2e-gcp 5681732 link true /test e2e-gcp
ci/prow/unit 5681732 link true /test unit
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-runc 5681732 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-runc

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants