Skip to content

Conversation

rphillips
Copy link

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. label Aug 8, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rphillips: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from mrunalp and sjenning August 8, 2025 14:44
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 8, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rphillips
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign mrunalp for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@rphillips
Copy link
Author

/payload-aggregate periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.20-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade 7

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 8, 2025

@rphillips: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.20-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/42e140b0-7466-11f0-9e71-43bdaf522c22-0

@rphillips
Copy link
Author

/test e2e-gcp

@rphillips rphillips closed this Aug 14, 2025
@rphillips rphillips reopened this Aug 14, 2025
@rphillips rphillips force-pushed the kubelet-metrics-logger branch from 3ed3ff9 to b49a298 Compare August 14, 2025 19:59
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rphillips: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@rphillips
Copy link
Author

/payload-aggregate periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.20-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt 3
/payload-aggregate periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.20-upgrade-from-stable-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade 3
/payload-aggregate periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.20-upgrade-from-stable-4.19-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade 3

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 14, 2025

@rphillips: trigger 3 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.20-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.20-upgrade-from-stable-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.20-upgrade-from-stable-4.19-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/4dd84d00-7949-11f0-91f1-940663d3a444-0

@rphillips
Copy link
Author

/payload-aggregate-with-prs periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.20-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt openshift/machine-config-operator#5248 3

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 14, 2025

@rphillips: it appears that you have attempted to use some version of the payload command, but your comment was incorrectly formatted and cannot be acted upon. See the docs for usage info.

@rphillips
Copy link
Author

/payload-aggregate-with-prs openshift/machine-config-operator#5248 periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.20-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt 3

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 14, 2025

@rphillips: it appears that you have attempted to use some version of the payload command, but your comment was incorrectly formatted and cannot be acted upon. See the docs for usage info.

@rphillips
Copy link
Author

/payload-aggregate-with-prs periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.20-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt 3 openshift/machine-config-operator#5248

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 14, 2025

@rphillips: it appears that you have attempted to use some version of the payload command, but your comment was incorrectly formatted and cannot be acted upon. See the docs for usage info.

@rphillips
Copy link
Author

/payload-aggregate-with-prs periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.20-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt 3 openshift/machine-config-operator#5248

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 14, 2025

@rphillips: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.20-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/fdece990-794d-11f0-9c3d-4ccdf55ea014-0

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 15, 2025

@rphillips: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 3ed3ff9 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-crun b49a298 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-crun
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-runc b49a298 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-runc
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial b49a298 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview b49a298 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn b49a298 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial b49a298 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants