Skip to content

Conversation

jim-minter
Copy link
Contributor

fixes #17074

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 31, 2017
@jim-minter
Copy link
Contributor Author

@smarterclayton @bparees making this change appears to resolve #17074 but I want to confirm with you if it's safe to do or not?
#17074 is somewhat of an echo of #14725, which was resolved in #14792; I think maybe this diff was missing from #14792?

@bparees I'm wondering what test coverage is appropriate for this. Also is it worth implementing the event that was suggested in #14725?

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Oct 31, 2017

@bparees I'm wondering what test coverage is appropriate for this.

we should have an e2e test that verifies ICT triggered builds, it sounds like it needs to test triggering all 4 kinds of builds (s2i, docker, custom, pipeline).

Also is it worth implementing the event that was suggested in #14725?

@jim-minter where would we attach the event? to the buildconfig that we tried to trigger?

@jim-minter
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jim-minter where would we attach the event? to the buildconfig that we tried to trigger?

That would make sense to me.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 31, 2017
@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 31, 2017
@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Nov 1, 2017

you can drop the prune flake commit, i believe @miminar's fix has merged.

@bparees bparees added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Nov 1, 2017
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 6, 2017
@jim-minter jim-minter changed the title [WIP] allow image trigger controller to create custom builds allow image trigger controller to create custom builds Nov 6, 2017
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 6, 2017
@jim-minter
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test extended_image_registry

@jim-minter
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bparees ptal

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Nov 7, 2017

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 7, 2017
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bparees, jim-minter, smarterclayton

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:

You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Automatic merge from submit-queue.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit c5b38be into openshift:master Nov 8, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

chaining builds via imagestreamtags not triggering
5 participants