Skip to content

increase the podLogTimeout for downward volume test #17627

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2017
Merged

increase the podLogTimeout for downward volume test #17627

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2017

Conversation

mfojtik
Copy link
Contributor

@mfojtik mfojtik commented Dec 6, 2017

Increase timeout for the test based on kubernetes/kubernetes#33165

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 6, 2017
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 6, 2017
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files label Dec 6, 2017
@mfojtik
Copy link
Contributor Author

mfojtik commented Dec 6, 2017

Based on the linked issue, this depends on the sync-internal, but not sure which one.

@jsafrane @smarterclayton any ideas?

@mfojtik
Copy link
Contributor Author

mfojtik commented Dec 6, 2017

/retest

prometheus flake...

@mfojtik
Copy link
Contributor Author

mfojtik commented Dec 6, 2017 •
edited
Loading

/retest

flake: #17634

@mfojtik mfojtik force-pushed the fix-downward-volume-flake branch from 80fc753 to ff71daf Compare December 6, 2017 18:18
@mfojtik mfojtik changed the title [WIP] UPSTREAM: 00000: increase the podLogTimeout for downward volume test [WIP] increase the podLogTimeout for downward volume test Dec 6, 2017
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Dec 6, 2017

open this upstream

@mfojtik
Copy link
Contributor Author

mfojtik commented Dec 7, 2017

/retest

@deads2k i will, need to make sure this fixes it, will run couple more retests, but so far this PR didn't hit the flake (other PR's are flaking hard on this).

@mfojtik
Copy link
Contributor Author

mfojtik commented Dec 7, 2017

@deads2k @jsafrane ok, this seems to fix that flake, I haven't seen it in any test run here.

@mfojtik
Copy link
Contributor Author

mfojtik commented Dec 12, 2017

/retest

@mfojtik mfojtik mentioned this pull request Dec 12, 2017
Merged
@mfojtik mfojtik force-pushed the fix-downward-volume-flake branch from ff71daf to f5f8984 Compare December 12, 2017 13:51
@mfojtik
Copy link
Contributor Author

mfojtik commented Dec 12, 2017

@deads2k upstream: kubernetes/kubernetes#57099

I haven't seen this flake here, so this might fix it.

@mfojtik mfojtik changed the title [WIP] increase the podLogTimeout for downward volume test increase the podLogTimeout for downward volume test Dec 12, 2017
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 12, 2017
@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

soltysh commented Dec 14, 2017

/retest
/lgtm
/priority queue/fix

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 14, 2017
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mfojtik, soltysh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:

You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Automatic merge from submit-queue.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a9bfbc4 into openshift:master Dec 18, 2017
@mfojtik mfojtik deleted the fix-downward-volume-flake branch September 5, 2018 21:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@deads2k deads2k Awaiting requested review from deads2k

1 more reviewer

@soltysh soltysh soltysh approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements
Assignees

@soltysh soltysh

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. queue/fix size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
6 participants
@mfojtik @deads2k @soltysh @openshift-ci-robot @openshift-bot @openshift-merge-robot